Nola Kulig
Kulig Financial Advisors
Longmeadow, MA, 01116 USA
Add to Contacts

2017 Q3 Market Review: Markets Continue to Rise Despite Geopolitical Turmoil and Natural Disasters

November 1st, 2017

This is our review of the markets for third quarter and year-to-date 2017. Long term readers know that we do not believe in making forecasts, instead commenting on cross currents influencing the markets. As usual, our goal is to look at recent market results, put them in perspective, and see how that experience should set our expectations going forward.

We look at the following topics:

  • 2017 Q3 and Year-to-Date Markets Review
    • Summary of Returns
    • What Does all This Mean?
  • Conclusion

2017 Q3 and Year-to-Date Market Review

Summary of Returns

The S&P 500 Index finished the quarter at a record high. Notably, the closely followed gauge of 500 large U.S. stocks ran up its quarterly winning streak to eight consecutive quarters (MarketWatch data

It’s done so in the face of three devastating hurricanes—Harvey, Irma and Maria, dysfunction in Washington, unsettling news from North Korea, and gridlock in Washington.

But in many respects, it shouldn’t be all that surprising; economic fundamentals are actually supportive of good stock performance.

Stocks take their longer-term marching orders from corporate profit growth. And profits are driven primarily by economic growth at home and abroad.

Currently, we’re in the midst of a synchronized global expansion, which has created a strong tailwind for earnings.

Moreover, interest rates remain near historic lows, and the Federal Reserve hasn’t been shy about signaling that any rate hikes are expected to come at a gradual pace.

If I had to concoct a recipe for bull market, I’d go heavy on profits, economic growth, and low interest rates—Oh, wait a minute—that’s today’s environment!

The markets focus on these factors to the exclusion of nearly everything else, like the massive damage to lives and property in Texas, Florida, and Puerto Rico. Short term, the economic data is taking a hit from the storms. Longer term, the markets are saying it is unlikely to have much impact on the economic trajectory. (Please note that some of your dollars were donated from Kulig Financial Advisor’s profits and were matched by TD Ameritrade, your custodian if you have ongoing investment services with us.)

While North Korea’s quest for an ICBM that can strike the U.S. is also very unsettling, short-term investors seem to be pricing in the unpredictability of the rogue regime. More importantly—speaking strictly from an investment perspective—investors aren’t anticipating a disruption in the economic cycle.

So, while we should be prepared for more troubling news, it simply isn’t affecting U.S. economic activity.


Market Returns




Q3 2017

YTD 2017

Large Cap S&P 500 Index




Midcap S&P Midcap




Small Cap S&P Small Cap




Non-US Developed Markets MSCI EAFE




Emerging Markets MSCI Emerging Mkts.




US Bonds Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate








MLPs Alerian MLP




Gold S&P GSCI Gold Sub index Total Return        -2.8 3.0 10.7
Commodities S&P Dow Jones Commodity Index TR




Sources: AJO Partners, Factset, S&P Dow Jones Indexes

What Does All This Mean?

Many of you have asked if the steady climb upward in stocks and their accompanying high values mean it is time to take some risk off of portfolios. This is an excellent question, and while we have discussed what this means for individual portfolios, it provides an opportunity to discuss our investment philosophy.

If we (meaning both you and Kulig Financial Advisors) have properly assessed risk tolerance and capacity when the portfolio was built, and done some other planning, then we shouldn’t need to make radical changes to your portfolio for several reasons:

  • If you have followed our counsel, those still working have sufficient emergency reserves and insurance in place; if you are retired, you have either sources of guaranteed income (like pensions and Social Security) or cash to cover several years’ expenses. If that is the case, then your longer term portfolio truly is for more discretionary expenses, and a market decline won’t impact your ability to keep the lights on or put food on the table.
  • We believe it is extremely difficult to predict future market direction, and the only real option anyone has is to maintain a carefully selected risk level for a portfolio. With the stock market mostly up since the 2008 crash, it would have been easy to say that stocks were highly valued for a while and that it was time to get out. With hindsight, that would have been a mistake.
  • While we don’t believe in market timing, we do favor rebalancing to your target allocation for stocks and all other assets. Those of you who have assets managed or advised on by us have in fact been taking profits out of stocks and placing them in lower risk or lower priced assets. In some cases this meant buying international stock markets which were underweighted and which have lower stock values. For others, it has meant buying bonds from time to time. The re-allocations depended on the starting positions for each portfolio. Again, these changes were guided by your asset allocation, not a short term forecast of a US stock market decline.

We hope this puts risk in a perspective that takes into account your individual financial situation and portfolio design. Those are the major reasons to make changes to portfolios, and they do not change that often.


We would reiterate to make sure you are at your recommended risk level and asset allocation for your portfolio. If you are, then all is well, and you can focus your attention elsewhere. If not, please make adjustments so that you are. And last but not least, if you are not sure, please call and let’s see where you need to be.

Thank you very much for your trust and confidence.


Steps to Take Following the Equifax Breach

November 1st, 2017

Note: this article was sent last month to clients immediately following the Equifax data breach.

This month’s post concerns steps to take following the Equifax breach. There is lots of information in the public domain (here is one at, but you might find some of it conflicting. Also, if you have followed some of the steps in the preceding article, the Equifax website has been frustrating for millions.

I can speak to these steps having been impacted by the Blue Cross/Blue Shield data breach some time ago! So far, no identity fraud has been detected, although I think about it with every transaction I make.

Step 1: Assume you are impacted

Equifax has been very cagey about stating whether consumers have been impacted by the breach. If you go to and enter your information, you may get a message that says you “may” be impacted. They announced at one point they would be contacting those impacted by e-mail. I know we have received nothing, have you?

Given the size of Equifax’s business in the credit reporting industry, you should assume you are impacted. So then what?

Step 2: Freeze your Credit

Contact the three major credit reporting agencies and freeze your credit. This means that you are sealing your credit reports; the company provides you with a PIN that only you know, which you can use to “unfreeze” your credit for legitimate inquiries on your credit. This means that even if crooks get your information, they cannot open new credit in your name.

You can do this online (assuming you have good computer security set up) or by phone. Clark Howard, who is a debt expert has a good guide to freezing credit at all three agencies. It can be found at

Step 4: Use a Credit Monitoring Service

There are many available, including at the credit reporting agencies. Equifax is offering one for free to those impacted by the breach, but when I tried the link at their website, I got a message saying I would have to wait until September 14th (this was on the 9th). Since I already have another service, I am not pursuing theirs.

(Equifax also has a statement regarding the monitoring service that clients using it waive their rights to a class action suit; some commentary points out that this applies to the monitoring service, rather than the breach itself. But waiving rights to either is not good.)

If you do not already have a service, I recommend you not wait. Also, you may not feel so good about letting the company who had the breach do the monitoring.

Instead, you may want to use, which is also free and provides credit reports, which by the way, you should probably check.

Step 5: Beware Phishing Messages and Phone Calls

Once someone has your information, you may be a particular target for scams via e-mail and by phone. When e-mail arrives concerning something financial, be sure to contact the entity directly, rather than by clicking on a link provided in the message. Look for misspellings and grammatical mistakes, which can be an indication of a fraudulent message. Do not answer the phone for numbers you do not recognize, and carefully evaluate any voicemails you receive.

Step 6: Go to the Social Security Website and Establish 2-Step Authentication

The website is I think it is self-explanatory why you would want to do this one.

Step 7: Use 2-Step Authentication at Any Website with your Credit Card Number

For example, offers this, and it would be desirable anywhere you have a credit card on file. You may also want to think about where you do have credit cards on file and delete them if they are not absolutely necessary to use a site. It may be worth typing that information in over again, especially if it is a site you do not use frequently and may forget that your card information resides there.


I hope none of you have any trouble from the Equifax situation. Please take this issue seriously and do what you can to protect yourselves. Best of luck!

2016 Q4 Market Review: A Year of Thwarted Forecasts

January 23rd, 2017

This is our review of the markets for fourth quarter and year of 2016. As you know, we do not believe in making forecasts, but we comment on cross currents influencing the markets. As usual, our goal is to look at recent market results, put them in perspective, and see how that experience should set our expectations going forward.

We look at the following topics:

  • 2016 Q4 and Year-to-Date Markets Review
    • Summary of Returns
    • The Markets’ Twists and Turns in 2016
  • What Does all This Mean?
  • Conclusion

2016 Q4 and Year-to-Date Market Review

Summary of Returns

As I write this review of the markets in 2016, some trends from the fourth quarter are already waning. Nonetheless, looking at what we experienced last year may be instructive as we look at the year ahead.

Last year was a tough one for prognosticators and strategists. There were so many twists and turns from a macroeconomic and political perspective that many experts, pollsters and forecasters had their hands full. Those activities are usually fraught with peril, as the error rate is high, but last year seemed worse than usual.

By now, it is old news how wrong the experts were about Brexit and the US election outcome. Not only that, but if they managed to call the Trump victory correctly, they usually got the market’s reaction wrong. Rather than nose diving, the stock market took off and headed for record territory.

Some additional observations from the table of returns, which follows:

  • The 12-month return for the S&P 500 Index of 12.0% was well above the long-term historical average since 1926 of 10.1%
  • In the US, small cap companies led the way, followed by medium-sized companies.
  • Style indexes are not shown, but value trumped growth (pun intended).
  • Emerging markets did well for the year, despite declining after Trump’s election win.
  • Developed markets outside the US rebounded in the fourth quarter, but still turned in a poor year.
  • High quality bonds did poorly, based on an outlook of increasing rates.
  • US Real estate investment trusts (REITs) did surprisingly well, considering their higher yielding nature and a consensus outlook for higher rates.
  • Master limited partnerships continued to benefit from both a firming in energy prices and investors’ hunt for income.
  • Commodities in general did well, with a firming US economy and an emerging consensus of further growth and firming inflation.
  • Despite declining in the fourth quarter, gold held onto positive results for the year.
Market Returns
Market Index December Q4 2016 2016
Large Cap S&P 500 Index 2.0% 3.8% 12.0%
Midcap S&P Midcap 2.2 7.4 20.7
Small Cap S&P Small Cap 3.4 11.1 26.6
Non-US Developed Markets MSCI EAFE 3.4 -0.7 1.0
Emerging Markets MSCI Emerging Mkts. 0.2 -4.2 11.2
US Bonds Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate 0.1 -3.0 2.7
REITs S&P US REIT 4.7 -3.0 8.5
MLPs Alerian MLP 4.4 2.0 18.3
Gold S&P GSCI Gold Sub index Total Return -1.9 -12.7 7.8
Commodities S&P Dow Jones Commodity Index TR 1.3 3.8 13.3

Sources: AJO Partners, Factset, S&P Dow Jones Indexes

The Markets’ Twists and Turns in 2016

When we see the extremely strong finish for stock markets in 2016, it is worth recalling that it started out in a very rocky fashion, with comparisons to 2008 that were too numerous to count.

Markets later had to deal with the UK’s decision on whether to stay in the European Union. Pollsters predicted the country would remain, but instead we got Brexit, which is still a long-term proposition in terms of its eventual impact. We counseled maintaining your asset allocation through this period, and not making any brash moves. While the markets initially reacted strongly, once they got over the shock, they began to function normally again.

In fact, in the months leading up to the November US presidential election central bank policy produced considerable calm in the markets. In our last quarterly review, we questioned how long the “eerie calm” could last, as an environment where trading volume is low and most asset classes rise together cannot go on indefinitely. But it is impossible to forecast when and how it might end.

When it did end, it was fortunately to the upside. When Donald Trump won the election, stock markets initially lurched downward. Then they turned sharply upward, and the rest, as they say, is history. A consensus view emerged that Trump policies of infrastructure spending, reduced regulation and tax reform would kick start the US economy out of the low growth rate it has experienced since the Great Recession. Rather than deflation, we might need to focus on the potential for inflation, and with it, higher interest rates. The focus moved decidedly from Fed watching to Trump watching.

The only problem with this consensus view is that we aren’t there yet. As I write, Trump will be taking office in a few days, his cabinet still needs approval, and he has already had to revise some policies. Since we have a democratic government, his proposals will be subject to considerable debate, even though we have a Republican majority in both houses and a Republican president. In just the last week, the “Trump trade” has begun to recede, as markets got ahead of themselves. While we may ultimately get to where Trump wants us, the markets may have already fully priced most of that scenario into asset values.

What Does All This Mean?

The unpredictability of last year was a textbook example of why investors need fully diversified portfolios. If one had taken forecasters seriously, a lot of money could have been left on the table or outright losses experienced.

For example, a prospect (now client) came to see me in November, just prior to the election. He was getting to know several advisors as part of his selection process. One had recommended that the client liquidate a good portion of his portfolio on the supposition that if Trump won, it would negatively impact the markets. What did I think?

Long term readers of this newsletter and clients already know how I responded. Extreme changes in your asset allocation are rarely warranted, if you have carefully selected it based not only on your aptitude for risk, but as important, your capacity to bear risk.

Moreover, forecasting in general has a low batting average, especially in the political or macroeconomic realm. These are very difficult issues to fully analyze and get right. Not only that, but one can construct a completely cogent and thorough analysis and yet misread what market consensus really is, or how much is in asset prices.

I responded that the advisor in question could possibly be correct, but there was an equal chance he could be wrong. So to make an extreme change in a portfolio with no hedge in case of a potentially faulty forecast is a risky approach. If there is one thing I have learned, it is how often the markets can fool us. Also, we should avoid building what might be called a “single scenario” portfolio—one that has to have a specific set of conditions met for it to be correct. Instead, it should be as much as possible an “all weather” portfolio, with components that will help it weather different types of markets, since we can never really be certain in advance what may come our way.

So my new client did not liquidate most of his portfolio and is better off for it. We did, however, make some other adjustments based on his unique needs and circumstances.


Last quarter, we noted in that we expected volatility to rise as markets sort things out. Factors contributing to that view were that we were in an election year where the race was hotly contested, and there was some uncertainty regarding Federal Reserve policy.

Now that the election is behind us, things look no more certain than they did last year, despite the market’s reaction to the Trump victory. Now we will really see what the new administration can do, how the economy will fare, what the Fed will do, etc. And let’s not forget factors outside the US—the state of China’s economy, rising nationalism in Europe, and central bank policy outside the US.

Need I say more to make the case for a diversified portfolio?

We would reiterate to make sure you are at your recommended risk level and asset allocation for your portfolio. If you are, then all is well, and you can focus your attention elsewhere. If not, please make adjustments so that you are. And last but not least, if you are not sure, please call and let’s see where you need to be.

Thank you very much for your trust and confidence. We look forward to working with you in 2017. Happy New Year!

Investment advisor representative of an investment advisory services offered through Garrett Investment Advisors, LLC, a fee-only SEC registered investment advisor. Tel: (910) FEE-ONLY. Kulig Financial Advisors may offer investment advisory services in the state of Massachusetts and other jurisdictions where exempted.